Back to Insights

Can a Company in the Red Still Apply for a Subsidy? The Financial Requirements, Explained Once and for All

Chinese business owners who have started or run companies in Japan have surely faced this dilemma: the company posted a loss last year or this year (went into the red), urgently needs working capital or to invest in a new project, yet worries that being in the red means it can't apply for a subsidy. This concern is reasonable, but it also involves many misunderstandings...

The fact is: a company in the red absolutely can apply for a subsidy—but it needs to meet specific financial requirements. Starting from how Japanese subsidies actually work, this article explains in detail how a loss-making company can successfully apply for a subsidy.

Japan's Stance Toward Loss-Making Companies: Not an Outright Rejection

The Essential Goal of the Subsidy System

Japan's subsidy (hojokin) system, especially subsidies aimed at SMEs, has as its core purpose supporting corporate innovation, transformation, and growth—not rewarding companies that are already profitable. In other words, companies going through a difficult phase are precisely the ones the subsidy system aims to help.

Whether you are a newly founded startup or a mature company temporarily in the red due to market changes, as long as you meet the financial requirements, you have a chance to obtain subsidy support.

The Core Logic of Subsidies for Loss-Making Companies

The reasons the Japanese government and the various prefectures support loss-making companies are simple:

  • Companies in difficulty are the ones that most need funds to complete technological upgrades, market development, or organizational restructuring.
  • A subsidy can help a company weather the crisis without adding to its debt burden.
  • Companies that successfully turn around will go on to create more tax revenue and jobs.

Therefore, being in the red is not an obstacle to applying for a subsidy. What matters is the reason for your losses, your business plan, and your repayment ability (for subsidies that carry a repayment obligation).

The Financial Requirements Loss-Making Companies Must Understand

1. The Three Tiers of Subsidy Financial Requirements

Different subsidies place different requirements on loss-making companies. Understanding these three tiers can help you quickly judge whether you qualify.

Tier One: No Hard Financial Requirements

Some subsidies (such as certain startup subsidies, and a first-time application to the Monozukuri Subsidy) place no hard restrictions on loss-making companies. As long as you have a complete business plan (jigyo keikakusho) that clearly explains why you want to invest and how this investment will turn things around, you have a chance to apply.

Typical examples:

  • The Startup Subsidy (sogyo hojokin): aimed at startups, many of which are in the red to begin with.
  • The Business Restructuring Subsidy (jigyo saikochiku hojokin): explicitly supports companies in operational difficulty as they transform.

Tier Two: Conditional Requirements

Most subsidies have the following common requirements for loss-making companies:

  1. Cap on the loss amount: the loss may not exceed 50% of the average operating profit over the past three years, or a specified amount.
  2. Own-funds requirement: you must demonstrate that you have a certain amount of your own funds to match the subsidy investment.
  3. Business improvement plan: you must submit a detailed business improvement plan explaining how this investment will reverse the loss.

Taking the Monozukuri Subsidy as an example, for a second or later application, the requirements are usually:

  • The loss since the previous application must not exceed 30% of the subsidy amount applied for.
  • A new business improvement plan must be submitted.

Tier Three: Strict Restrictions

Some subsidies place strict restrictions on the extent of losses, for example:

  • Some financing products (which are actually loans rather than subsidies) require the company to remain profitable.
  • A very small number of subsidies require the applicant company to have been profitable for two consecutive years in the past.

2. Reading the Key Financial Indicators

In Japanese subsidy applications, reviewing officials focus on these financial indicators:

Operating Profit Margin (eigyo riekiritsu)

Formula: operating profit ÷ net sales × 100%

  • A loss-making company has a negative operating profit margin.
  • When applying for a subsidy, you need to submit a business plan explaining how the operating profit margin will turn positive within 2–3 years after receiving the subsidy.
  • Even with a current margin of -10%, if your improvement plan is reasonable, you can still pass the review.

Current Ratio (ryudo hiritsu)

Formula: current assets ÷ current liabilities

  • This indicator measures a company's short-term solvency.
  • Companies with a ratio below 100% (i.e., current liabilities exceed current assets) need to provide a more detailed funding plan.
  • An injection of subsidy funds can directly improve this indicator.

Equity Ratio (jiko shihon hiritsu)

Formula: shareholders' equity ÷ total assets × 100%

  • Accumulated losses lower the equity ratio.
  • Japan's Financial Services Agency generally considers an equity ratio of 20% or more to be healthy.
  • Companies below 10% need to explain their funding-utilization plan in particular detail when applying for a subsidy.

3. Financial Self-Check List Before Applying for a Subsidy

Before formally applying for a subsidy, you should check the following:

| Check Item | Common Situation for Loss-Making Companies | Documents to Prepare | |---------|----------------|--------------| | Clarity of the reason for the loss | Can you clearly explain the cause of the loss (market decline, failed investment, unforeseen event, etc.)? | 3 years of financial statements + a description of business conditions | | Feasibility of the turnaround | Is there a concrete plan to reverse the loss (cutting costs / opening new markets / product upgrades, etc.)? | A detailed business plan | | Subsidy-utilization plan | Is it clear which projects the subsidy will be used for, and what the expected ROI is? | Equipment purchase list, itemized investment budget | | Matching-funds capability | Can you cover the portion the subsidy doesn't (subsidies usually cover only 50–75%)? | Bank loan certification or proof of own funds | | Repayment-obligation assessment | For a repayment-type subsidy, can you repay within the prescribed period? | Cash-flow projection |

Practical Strategies for Loss-Making Companies Applying for Subsidies

Strategy One: Choose a Subsidy Type Suited to Loss-Making Companies

Subsidies strongly recommended for loss-making companies:

  1. Business Restructuring Subsidy (jigyo saikochiku hojokin)

    • Subsidy amount: JPY 1 million–100 million (depending on business scale)
    • Feature: explicitly supports companies facing difficulties due to the pandemic, industry shifts, etc. as they undertake major transformation
    • Loss-making-company friendliness: ★★★★★
    • Application difficulty: moderate
  2. Monozukuri Subsidy (manufacturing subsidy)

    • Subsidy amount: JPY 500,000–50 million
    • Feature: supports companies in purchasing equipment and improving production processes
    • Loss-making-company friendliness: ★★★★
    • Application difficulty: moderate
    • Note: first-time applications are lenient on losses; later applications require an explanation of improvements since the previous one
  3. Startup Subsidy (sogyo hojokin)

    • Subsidy amount: JPY 2 million–30 million
    • Feature: supports startups, which are usually in the red for their first two years
    • Loss-making-company friendliness: ★★★★★
    • Application difficulty: low–moderate

Subsidy types to avoid or apply for with caution:

  • R&D-type subsidies (usually require technical strength and financial stability)
  • Certain local governments' industrial-promotion subsidies (some regions have profitability requirements)
  • Financing-guarantee products (these are actually loans, not subsidies)

Strategy Two: Build a Persuasive Business Plan

This is the most critical step for a loss-making company applying for a subsidy. The subsidy review committee will judge, through your plan: can this subsidy help the company turn things around?

Core Element One: Analysis of the Cause of the Loss

Don't shy away from the loss—analyze the cause in depth. For example:

❌ Wrong way to write it: "Last year the company lost JPY 5 million; market competition is fierce."

✅ Right way to write it: "In 2023 the company's sales fell 15% (from JPY 50 million to JPY 42.5 million), for three main reasons: (1) the market share of our flagship product A was eroded by a new entrant, falling 20%; (2) raw material costs rose 30% and we failed to raise prices in time; (3) turnover in the sales team stalled the development of new customers. Through this subsidy investment, we plan to take the following measures…"

Core Element Two: A Clear Link Between Investment and Return

A loss-making company must clearly explain exactly where this subsidy will be used and how it will generate a return.

Case: a Chinese manufacturing owner applying for the Monozukuri Subsidy

  • Subsidy amount applied for: JPY 8 million
  • Utilization plan: purchase automation equipment to replace 3 operators
  • Expected results:
    • Production efficiency up 40%
    • Labor costs down JPY 2.4 million per year
    • Product defect rate down from 5% to 2%, saving JPY 1.8 million in value per year
    • Turnaround achieved in 2024, with an expected profit of JPY 2 million

A business plan like this lets the review committee clearly see the return on investment.

Core Element Three: Proof of Credibility

A loss-making company's credibility is crucial. You need to demonstrate that:

  • You have industry experience and professional ability.
  • Your investment direction is reasonable.
  • You have a contingency plan for handling risk.

Concrete steps:

  1. Attach proof of your team members' backgrounds.
  2. Provide reference letters from customers or partners.
  3. Explain the technical background of the investment or the basis in market research.
  4. Reserve a contingency plan (what to do if the main plan goes off course).

Strategy Three: Designing a Matching-Funds Plan

Subsidies usually cover 50–75% of project costs, with the company raising the rest. How can a loss-making company solve this?

Option One: Matching with a Bank Loan

Even if the company is in the red, you can obtain a loan as long as the collateral or guarantor is sufficient. Suggestions:

  • Contact the Japan Finance Corporation (Nihon Seisaku Kinyu Koko) for a low-interest loan.
  • Apply for a credit guarantee (through a Credit Guarantee Association) to reduce the bank's risk.
  • The loan amount can usually reach 50–100% of the subsidy.

Option Two: Investing Own Funds in Installments

If you have personal savings or other assets, you can invest them in installments:

  • Invest 20–30% in the first year.
  • Invest 30–40% after receiving the subsidy.
  • Invest the remainder in the second year, using cash flow from improved operations.

Option Three: Supplier Financing

Negotiate installment payments with the equipment supplier:

  • First obtain the subsidy.
  • Use the subsidy to pay for part of the equipment.
  • Sign an installment contract with the supplier to pay the balance.

Common Financial Pitfalls for Loss-Making Companies Applying for Subsidies

Pitfall 1: Concealing the Loss

Harm: Once discovered, it directly results in rejection of the application, and in serious cases blacklisting.

Correct approach: Explain your financial situation proactively, in detail, and honestly. Japan's subsidy system is transparent, and reviewers will certainly examine your financial statements. Rather than concealing, it is better to be candid and provide an improvement plan.

Pitfall 2: Overstating the Subsidy's Effect

Harm: If the promised improvement cannot be achieved, it affects future applications and may even lead to a demand for repayment.

Correct approach:

  • Set the projected improvement at a confidence level of 70–80%.
  • Reserve a 10–20% risk buffer.
  • Note that it is "based on a follow-up assessment X months later."

For example, if you are 80% confident that sales can grow 20%, write in the plan "expected sales growth of 15–18%."

Pitfall 3: An Unrealistic Matching-Funds Plan

Harm: Reviewers will conclude that you cannot actually carry out the subsidy project.

Correct approach:

  • Obtain bank loan approval or a pre-approval letter in advance.
  • Clearly list the sources of your own funds.
  • If you have supplier support, attach the supplier's letter of confirmation.

Pitfall 4: Ignoring the Subsidy's Post-Award Obligations

Harm: After receiving the subsidy, failing to report as required or to meet the usage requirements results in repayment.

Correct approach:

  • Reserve 10–15% of the budget for reporting and audit costs.
  • Engage a professional accountant or consulting firm to help organize the materials.
  • Establish a dedicated project management file.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: My company has been in the red for two consecutive years. Can I still apply for a subsidy?

A: Absolutely. Consecutive losses can, in fact, further demonstrate that you need external support and financial help. The key is that your application plan must answer three questions: (1) What were the specific causes of these two years of losses? (2) Why can these causes be improved through subsidy investment? (3) What gives you the confidence that you can turn things around within the next 12–24 months?

For example: if you run a restaurant business that lost money for two years because of the pandemic, but the pandemic is now over and you want to use the subsidy to renovate the storefront and upgrade the menu system, that is very persuasive. Conversely, if the cause of your losses is chaotic management and staff turnover, a subsidy won't help, and reviewers will reject it. So the core issue is not whether you are in the red, but whether the cause of the loss can be improved through a concrete investment.

Q2: Will subsidy reviewers examine my complete financial reports and tax records?

A: Yes. Almost all subsidies require you to submit complete financial reports (kessan hokokusho) and tax filing records (zeimu shinkokusho) for the past 2–3 years. Some will also contact the National Tax Agency or the local tax office to confirm. So there is no room whatsoever to conceal your financial situation.

This is precisely why I advise loss-making companies to be candid. Reviewers will not reject you outright upon seeing a loss; instead, they will seriously assess your improvement plan. But if they find that your reports do not match your tax records, or find concealment, they will reject the application outright and may enter it into a negative record. The Organization for Small & Medium Enterprises and Regional Innovation, Japan (SBIR) maintains a credit database of subsidy applicants, and the records of dishonest applicants are retained for 5–10 years.

Q3: My loss is due to a one-off item (for example, a bad debt caused by a major customer's bankruptcy). Will this affect my application?

A: This situation actually works in your favor. A one-off loss shows that the company's core business is healthy and it merely encountered force majeure. As long as you can clearly prove the nature of this loss and explain the company's normal operating condition, reviewers will have more confidence.

Recommended approach: In the application, itemize this one-off loss separately and attach the relevant supporting materials (such as the bankruptcy declaration notice of the bankrupt company, the accounting vouchers for the bad-debt write-off, etc.). Then calculate the "adjusted operating profit" (excluding one-off items)—this figure is more helpful for the review. For example, the 2023 financial statements show a loss of JPY 5 million, but JPY 3 million of that is a loss on receivables caused by a supplier's bankruptcy, so the adjusted loss is only JPY 2 million, greatly enhancing persuasiveness.

Q4: After receiving the subsidy, if the company continues to make losses, will I be required to repay it?

A: This depends on the type of subsidy. Most subsidies (such as the Monozukuri Subsidy and the Business Restructuring Subsidy) are one-time subsidies with no repayment obligation, so you do not need to repay even if the company continues to make losses afterward. However, there are usually the following requirements:

  1. Use restrictions: the subsidy must be used for the project promised at the time of application and cannot be diverted to other uses.
  2. Reporting obligations: you need to periodically report project progress and financial data (usually for 3–5 years).
  3. Effectiveness assessment: reviewers will follow up in the 2nd and 3rd years. If the effect clearly falls short of expectations, you will not need to repay, but it will affect your eligibility for future applications.

A small number of subsidies (particularly certain local government subsidies) may carry a repayment obligation. Such subsidies will be clearly marked "返還金あり" (repayment obligation) in the application requirements. Before applying for this type of subsidy, a loss-making company must assess its ability to repay within 3–5 years.

Q5: I am a sole proprietor (individual business), and my bookkeeping is a mess. Can I apply for a subsidy?

A: You can apply, but you need to fix your bookkeeping immediately. Japanese subsidies actually place stricter requirements on sole proprietors (freelancers, individual business owners), because there is no legal entity such as a company to serve as a safeguard. Specific requirements:

  1. You must establish complete books: in accordance with Japanese tax requirements, keep income-and-expense accounts, ideally using professional accounting software (such as Yayoi Kaikei) rather than by hand.
  2. You must file taxes on time: your tax filing records for the past 3 years must be complete and without any late filings.
  3. It is best to form a limited company or a joint-stock company: if your books are chaotic, it is strongly advised to register as a formal company before applying for a subsidy.

Specific steps:

  • Month 1: Engage a tax accountant (zeirishi) to organize the past 1–2 years of books.
  • Months 2–3: Complete missing filings or file amended returns.
  • Month 4: Establish a proper accounting system to ensure clear books going forward.
  • From Month 5: Begin preparing the subsidy application.

Doing this does incur costs (a tax accountant's fee may be JPY 50,000–200,000 per year), but it lays the foundation for applying for a subsidy (usually JPY 500,000 to several million), making it a very worthwhile investment.


Time Planning for a Loss-Making Company's Subsidy Application

Generally, from deciding to apply to receiving the subsidy, a loss-making company needs to allow the following time:

| Stage | Time | Main Tasks | |------|------|--------| | Preparation | 1–2 months | Organize finances, consult professionals, decide on the subsidy type | | Application | 1–2 months | Prepare materials, write the plan, submit the application | | Review | 2–3 months | Attend the public review session, await the result notice | | After approval | 1 month | Sign the subsidy grant agreement, set up the project account | | Execution | 6–12 months | Carry out the subsidy project, collect vouchers | | Reporting | 1 month | Submit the completion report, undergo the final audit |

Total: usually 12–18 months. So the earlier you start preparing, the better.

Special Reminders for Loss-Making Companies

  1. Choose a legitimate subsidy consulting service: Some shady agencies promise "100% approval" or "guaranteed application success"—these are scams. The subsidy application itself carries risk, and no one can guarantee approval. It is advisable to find a certified Sharoshi, Zeirishi, or subsidy consultant.

  2. Don't apply for too many subsidies at once: A loss-making company should concentrate its energy on doing one subsidy application well, rather than casting a wide net across many. Quality matters far more than quantity.

  3. Prepare sufficient matching funds: If you apply for a large subsidy amount (over JPY 5 million), be sure the matching funds are secured; otherwise, even if approved you cannot execute the project.

  4. Update financial projections regularly: A loss-making company's financial data changes frequently, so be sure to update your business plan and projections regularly; don't apply with outdated figures.


Conclusion

Being in the red is not a death sentence for a subsidy application; rather, it is a signal that you need to prepare your application materials more honestly, concretely, and thoroughly. The original intent of Japan's subsidy system is to help companies in difficulty weather the crisis. As long as you can clearly explain why you are losing money, how you will improve, and how the subsidy will help, you have a strong chance of obtaining support.

The key is not to avoid the loss, but to proactively and deeply analyze its causes and formulate a credible improvement plan.

If you still have specific questions about subsidy applications for loss-making companies, or need to assess whether your company meets the requirements of a particular subsidy, you are welcome to a free consultation. Our team of expert advisors can help you quickly judge the feasibility of an application and formulate a personalized subsidy application strategy.

Contact us now, and let us help your company find the right subsidy opportunity.

Want to know which subsidies you qualify for?

A 3-minute free self-check. Shisei Consulting's expert team matches you with the right plan — no approval, no fee.

Check My Eligibility for Free

Related Reading

Do You Need to Pay Taxes on Government Subsidies? A Complete Tax Guide for Chinese Business Owners in JapanWhat Subsidies Can Chinese Business Owners Operating Online Stores and E-Commerce in Japan Apply For?What Subsidies Can Chinese Real Estate & Brokerage Companies in Japan Apply For?
Free ConsultationOnline advisor · Instant reply